Should WWE Bring Back the Brand Split Rules in Full?

When WWE introduced the brand split, it gave Raw and SmackDown their own identities, rosters, championships and rivalries. It also created opportunities for more superstars to become important players rather than getting lost in an overcrowded roster.

However, WWE has regularly allowed superstars to appear across both brands, creating crossover matches, shared storylines and opportunities for unexpected interactions.

But has this taken away some of what made the brand split special?

Would WWE benefit from bringing back stricter rules, keeping Raw and SmackDown completely separate, or is having superstars cross between brands better for the product?

💬 Let's Debate!

• Should Raw and SmackDown have completely separate rosters?

• Should superstars only appear on their assigned brand unless officially traded?

• Should each brand have its own exclusive championships?

• Does the current crossover make WWE more entertaining?

• Would a stricter brand split create more opportunities for the roster?

• Which brand would have the stronger roster if the split was fully enforced?

Over to you! Should WWE bring back the brand split rules in full, or is the freedom to cross between brands better for business?