Sort Newest Hot Top
N
NimiWikiTeam posted in SWC · 1 week ago
Nimi Wiki — save videos from public social post links

I’m part of the Nimi Wiki team. We built a browser-based video-saving tool for public X/Twitter, Instagram, TikTok, and Bluesky post links: paste a post URL to start the download flow.

Website: Nimi Wiki video saver

I’d welcome feedback on whether the steps are clear, particularly on mobile. Please respect creators’ rights and each platform’s rules when saving or sharing videos.

62 Open
C
cpvr replied in SWC · 1 week ago
Who likes deep discussion forums?

I like deep discussions depending on the subject matter. I’m not interested in discussing politics or anything in that nature.

1 61 Open
C
cpvr replied in SWC · 1 week ago
Art Creation

On Oct 23, 2026, The Jason said:

I like 3D computer art as well as the AI stuff. Well, the AI is stuff is too easy LOL.

I’ve been into stuff like Poser (the program) since early 2010s.

I do too. I have a lot of friends that draw. It’s awesome to see what they’ve drawn over the years.

3 99 Open
Ravenfreak posted in Alt Forums · 2 weeks ago
What are you listening to?

I’m honestly surprised I haven’t made this thread yet. :V Anyways what are you currently listening to? I’m listening to the Opening Theme for Dragon Slayer: Eiyuu Densetsu on the Mega Drive via Foobar2000!

30 Open
Ravenfreak replied in Alt Forums · 2 weeks ago
Major PHP CVE "php2shell"

Yikes thankfully none of my sites were affected by this. (Since this forum is hosted on Forum Spark at least lol.) My other ones are fine too thankfully. I don’t have a VPS anymore so I don’t need to worry about having to upgrade anything.

1 51 Open
MoneyMan replied in Monetary Literacy & Mastery Foundation · 2 weeks ago
California's 'Wealth' Tax Is Coming For Everyone

Mark Moss has a pretty good segment on this!

California is about to vote on a plan to tax billionaires, hoping to raise about a hundred billion dollars. But something pretty incredible has already happened. Something that their analysts, they never even expected. And the crazy part is that the tax, it hasn't even passed yet. Now, this is the same pattern. We're seeing it all over the world. And this matters to you because, you know, whether you even have enough tax to be wealth taxed like the wealthy do, the wealth that they're proposing or not,

it's going to affect you either way. Now, I think we're going to see more of these types of taxes. So, in this video, I want to show you what's actually going on in California, what's happening. I want to show you the one assumption I think they're getting dangerously wrong. And I want to show you what we're seeing in California. We're seeing across the world. We're seeing it in in UK and even here in Portugal where I'm at could change the way you think about

protecting your wealth. You ready? Let's go. All right. So, let's get into this video. And uh it's a fitting video for me while I'm here. I'm in Portugal right now. I'm out here on the coastline uh doing some surfing, a little bit of vacation. And uh it's interesting because Portugal has a golden visa program which is to attract people with money, tax refugees if we'll call them. Let's talk about taxes for a minute. October 2025 um in California, the California Healthcare Union proposed a

one-time tax, just one time, don't worry, onetime tax of 5% of billionaires wealth, their entire wealth, whether it's been realized or not. A lot of these billionaires in California, they own businesses like Jeff Bezos owns Amazon or Elon Musk owns Tesla. Like it's not like it's money in his account they want to take. They want to take his company that he owns. Okay, so um they said they want to do that. They said that uh it was going to be retroactive if if it passes anybody that was there

as of January 1st and it has a very low chance of going through. But check this out. Here's the assumption. California assumed that if they did this 5% tax on the billionaire's wealth, they would be able to raise about $100 billion. And of course, that billion dollars is going to go to again Medicare, healthcare, things like that. Now, this is on the spreadsheet. This is the bean counters. This is people that don't understand that there's an actual real world out there, and they were caught off guard.

I'm going to break it down for you. But what they assumed is that some taxpayers would leave. They assumed that less than 10% would leave the state of California. Why? Well, cuz I live in California. It's the most beautiful place in the world. So, why would they want to leave that? Well, if you push them hard enough, maybe they will. They assumed for 10% of the people to leave. Now, they thought they were being clever also with this retroactive piece because it was going through so quickly and it

hasn't even got through yet. They thought that there was no way that billionaires could leave in such a short period of time. So, they thought that they thought they can catch him off guard. Hey, we're going to pass it, make it retroactive. We've only given them a couple months. There's no way a billionaire can move in a couple months. And so they're going to get caught in this, right? Well, as it turns out, no. The billionaires made very quick decisions. As a matter of fact,

California lost a lot of billionaires. Now, again, like this is very real for me. Uh, as I live in California, we've gone to Puerto Rico. We went to Puerto Rico. They have a very special tax program over there. We've moved there for taxes. Again, here I'm in Portugal. Um, I worked with a company that was uh helping people set up these golden visas in Portugal. And so recruiting taxpayers is a really big deal. When taxes change, people make real life decisions. Now, let me tell you what happened. Now, with

the billionaires leaving faster than they expected, California has now lost over $577 billion. Now, check this out. They thought they were going to gain a hundred billion. That's not the case. some of the billionaires that have already left California, the Google founders, Larry Page, Sergey Brin, uh Peter Teal, um Steven Spielberg, who's a, you know, huge left liberal advocate, uh David Sachs, turns out none of them want to have their wealth confiscated from them. And so they showed only 10%,

well, the analyst told them that only 10% would leave. And so far, what we know about over 28% of the billionaires have already left. Now, this is what we already know about. This is people who have made big announcements of this. I'm sure a lot of people have probably left quietly. So, it's probably well over 30%. So, $577 billion has already left. Now, where does this leave the forecast? They're hoping to raise a h 100red billion. Well, now they're expecting to only bring in about 28 to 36 billion of

the hundred billion they hope for. That's what they hope. And some of you might listen, well, at least they have the 26 or the 36 billion. Well, not really because that was a one-time tax. These people that left, the billionaires that left were residents of the state and they paid this tax every single year. The authors of this bill estimate that California billionaires were paying 3.3 to 5.8 billion per year in annual taxes. That's gone. So, while they get a one-time windfall of 28 billion, they're

losing 3 to 6 billion every single year. They assume that there's maybe another 2 billion that's going to be lost on top of that. And so the net present value of this bill is a lost income stream of 68.9 billion. So they've lost almost 70 billion from this on a bill that has only in the betting markets about a 23% chance of even going through. So when you add it up that yes they get the 30 if this even goes through. They have a 30 billion onetime tax windfall but they're losing 69 billion in present

value of lost future income taxes. Again, the betting markets look like this is not going to go through about a 23% chance. So, what happens if it doesn't pass? Do these billionaires come back? No, they don't come back. Do the businesses that have left come back? No, of course not. California is still going to end up losing over 577 billion dollars of wealth that's already gone. They've permanently poisoned the well for entrepreneurs who who now have to worry about what the potential of future

wealth taxes could be. So, what entrepreneur wants to build an estate that has already told them that they intend to steal part of their wealth? What what person would want to move to the state and set up businesses and build wealth in a state that's already told them that they want to steal their wealth? And of course, the answer is very few. They've poisoned the well. And so, not only have they lost that amount of wealth today on a bill that's probably not even go through, but they

poison the well. Now, the bigger question is, is your home next? Because this is happening in New York, it's happening in California, but it's happening all around the world. And so, for example, in the UK, the UK continues to increase wealth taxes. The UK has lost 16,500 millionaires in 2025. 16,500 millionaires left because unlike how unlike America and other countries, you could leave and get out of taxes altogether. And so, a lot of these these are going to Dubai where Dubai has no income tax, for example. And you have

beautiful services. You have safe streets you can walk around. The streets uh you know are nice and things like that. So, 16,500 have left. But here's the problem. You have the billionaires leaving California, have 16,500 millionaires leaving the UK, but the bills stay, the welfare state continues to grow, the revenue disappears, the bills go up. And so the question, while I'm here in Portugal having fun on vacation, and as I said, thinking about the golden visas that are available, there's places that are attracting you

and there's places that are trying to drive you away. The choice is yours where you want to stay. Let me know what you think in the comments down below. Uh, is this something that you're thinking about or is something on your radar or are you just going to suck it up and stay there? Let me know in the comments down below. As I always say, to your success, I'm out.

24 2K Open
MoneyMan posted in Monetary Literacy & Mastery Foundation · 2 weeks ago
Many blame capitalism for their affordability problems, when the true cause is statism.

Statism is the gradual replacement of civil society, markets, savings, and individual choice by political control, public spending, regulation, taxation, and monetary intervention.

In most developed economies, and increasingly in the United States since 2008, the dominant force is not free-market capitalism but a model of big government, chronic deficit spending, high debt, rising taxes, monetary debasement, regulatory obstruction, and political interventionism that protects insiders while penalizing new entrants. That is why so many millionaires and wealthy people support socialism. It is the perfect way to eliminate a merit-based system, obliterate competition, and keep privileges provided by political affiliation while demanding even more government control. Few people are richer and more powerful than socialist tyrants and their enablers. Meanwhile, socialism needs poor people that stay poor and remain submissive to the state.

Artificial money creation is never neutral. It disproportionately benefits governments and owners of assets that can protect themselves from monetary inflation. At the same time, it always hurts real wages, deposit savings, and those with no assets. Socialism is often sold as a rebellion against privilege, but in practice it is one of the most effective tools ever designed to entrench it. The bigger the state, the more valuable political access becomes. The more interventionist the system, the easier it is for large incumbents, bureaucracies, and connected interests to dictate regulation, capture subsidies, suppress competition, and decide who receives favors.

Brij Khurana, a fixed-income portfolio manager at Wellington Management writes in the Financial Times: “Perhaps there is no better example of the K-shaped nature of the US economy than the fact that employee compensation has fallen to 50 per cent of GDP, its lowest level since 1947, while household net worth is close to an all-time high of 546 per cent relative to GDP. This dichotomy helps explain the resurgence of socialism among younger Americans. Gen Z depends disproportionately on wages, whose purchasing power has been eroded by inflation, while baby boomers hold much of the country’s accumulated wealth. It is this wealth effect that is increasingly responsible for the inflation that remains in the US economy. Excluding shelter, core inflation has been relatively stable at about 2 per cent for the past three years. The stickiest components of inflation are related to housing, restaurants, travel and other services where demand is tied to wealth.

Socialism replaces success-driven inequality with a politically directed one. However, in statism inequality is a matter of price, not availability. Socialism leads to hyperinflation and scarcity because it ignores economic calculation and uses the debasement of currency to expropriate the wealth created by the remains of the private sector and keep citizens dependent and submissive, while the political leaders enjoy the perks of privilege. When the state spends too much and the central bank disguises the consequences, citizens are told they are being protected. However, they are being impoverished through currency dilution and asset inflation.

65 Open
ConnorF replied in Monetary Literacy & Mastery Foundation · 2 weeks ago
80 times bigger than Enron! 5.1 Trillion Fraud

Here's a good summary about this if it's going over your head.

Transcript Summary: Mitch Vexler on the Financial Crisis, Property Taxes, Debt, and Gold

ITM Trading Live Interview | October 15, 2026 | Approximately 61 minutes

Host: Daniela Cambone, ITM Trading Guest: Mitch Vexler, President of Mockingbird Properties

Executive Summary

Mitch Vexler argues that the United States and the broader global financial system are approaching a potentially catastrophic debt crisis driven by excessive leverage, questionable property valuations, municipal bond obligations, and systemic failures in financial oversight.

His central argument is that property taxation, school district borrowing, government debt, and central banking are interconnected parts of an increasingly unsustainable financial structure.

Vexler warns that unless governments intervene proactively, a cascading series of bond defaults could trigger widespread bank failures, significant losses to retirement savings, and potentially a global depression.

He advocates debt restructuring, greater transparency, eliminating property taxes in favor of consumption taxes, and holding physical gold and silver as protection against financial instability.

1. The Global Debt Crisis

Vexler claims that the scale of potential global financial exposure is substantially greater than the Enron scandal.

He references a chart identifying approximately $829 trillion in global financial exposures, although the interview does not establish how those figures were calculated or how much represents actual losses.

His principal concerns include:

  • Excessive leverage throughout financial markets.

  • Government and municipal bonds that may be worth substantially less than their stated values.

  • Pension funds, retirement accounts, and financial institutions holding these securities.

  • Interconnected international financial systems that could transmit losses across borders.

He describes two stages of financial contagion. The first involves spreading financial instability; the second occurs when governments fail to intervene early enough to prevent a broader collapse.

Vexler warns that the more severe scenario could produce a global depression and the failure of hundreds of American banks.

2. Property Taxes and School District Bonds

One of the interview's central subjects is Vexler's investigation into property tax assessments and school district financing.

He contends that property valuations are frequently overstated, forcing homeowners to pay increasingly unaffordable taxes.

He estimates that 42 million American households face financial pressure that could threaten their ability to retain their homes.

According to his argument, inflated assessments support school district borrowing that may not be sustainable.

He specifically criticizes the practice of refinancing existing school district obligations with capital appreciation bonds, which can defer payments while allowing interest obligations to accumulate.

Vexler characterizes this as a debt cycle in which new borrowing supports old obligations rather than resolving underlying financial problems.

He estimates that approximately $5.1 trillion in related obligations could require substantial restructuring or cancellation.

3. The Federal Reserve and Compound Debt

Vexler connects municipal borrowing problems to the broader structure of central banking.

His criticism focuses on debt creation, accumulating interest, and the compounding effect of borrowing to service existing obligations.

He argues that monetary expansion and leverage have contributed to inflated asset valuations and reduced the purchasing power of currency.

He also references the substantial loss of the U.S. dollar's purchasing power since the Federal Reserve's creation in 1913.

His underlying position is that a financial structure increasingly dependent on additional debt becomes progressively more vulnerable when incomes and productive economic activity fail to keep pace.

4. Proposed Solution: A Debt Jubilee

Vexler advocates a coordinated restructuring of debt obligations, which he calls a debt jubilee.

His proposal involves identifying questionable or unsustainable bonds, determining their economically supportable value, and reducing or canceling obligations that cannot realistically be repaid.

He argues that this process should occur proactively rather than after financial markets begin collapsing.

He stresses the importance of protecting U.S. Treasury securities and coordinating with other governments to prevent international financial contagion.

5. Property Tax Reform

Vexler proposes replacing property taxes with a broader sales-tax system.

His reasoning is that consumption taxes are more transparent and would eliminate many administrative costs associated with property assessment and collection.

He suggests an initial sales-tax rate around 15% in Texas, potentially declining to approximately 11% after several years. He also mentions a possible 9% rate in Montana.

His principal argument is that eliminating recurring property taxes would allow homeowners who have paid off their mortgages to own their homes without facing ongoing property-tax obligations.

These rates are his projections, not independently demonstrated fiscal estimates in the interview.

6. Legal Challenges and Constitutional Rights

A significant portion of the conversation concerns Vexler's litigation involving property assessments and government authorities.

He states that multiple Texas courts and the U.S. Supreme Court declined to adjudicate his constitutional claims.

Vexler believes these decisions raise serious questions about due process and constitutional protections.

He discusses a letter sent to President Donald Trump requesting a 72-hour emergency investigation involving federal authorities.

The letter reportedly asks the executive branch to examine possible constitutional violations, financial misconduct, and potential civil or criminal violations.

He also describes related litigation against appraisal officials and other government entities.

Importantly, the transcript presents Vexler's interpretation of these proceedings, not an independent legal determination that the alleged misconduct occurred.

7. Gold and Silver as Monetary Protection

Vexler considers physical precious metals an important protection against financial instability.

He emphasizes several characteristics:

  • Physical gold and silver do not depend on a bank or another financial institution's promise to pay.

  • Gold has historically served as a store of value.

  • Silver experiences substantial price volatility, which he believes can create buying opportunities.

  • Investors can accumulate metals gradually rather than purchasing everything at once.

He discusses a hypothetical monetary revaluation in which gold could reach approximately $46,000 per ounce if a specified portion of monetary aggregates were backed by U.S. gold holdings. Including government debt produces an estimate closer to $80,000 per ounce.

These figures are speculative scenarios based on his assumptions, not demonstrated market-price forecasts.

He also argues that governments may eventually have to support their currencies with gold, silver, or broader commodity baskets.

8. Practical Advice for Individuals

Vexler encourages homeowners to review property assessments, obtain public records, challenge valuations using comparable properties, and become involved in local government.

One important distinction is that he discourages simply refusing to pay property taxes. He recommends continuing to meet legal obligations while pursuing formal appeals and legal remedies.

For financial protection, he favors physical precious metals and financially sustainable, cash-generating assets. He expresses concern about highly valued equities, vulnerable bonds, and leveraged real estate.

The host also repeatedly promotes ITM Trading's wealth-protection consultations during the interview.

Key Takeaway

The interview's overarching message is that the apparent value of financial assets and the underlying economic value supporting those assets may be significantly different.

Vexler believes that growing debt obligations, rising property taxes, and declining household affordability expose fundamental weaknesses in the monetary and financial system.

He argues that genuine financial security depends on understanding these weaknesses, identifying counterparty risks, challenging questionable valuations, and holding assets that are less dependent on financial intermediaries.

Important distinction

The transcript combines legitimate economic subjects—compounding debt, bond-market risk, purchasing-power erosion, and counterparty exposure—with major allegations and highly speculative predictions.

Claims involving $829 trillion in global financial problems, widespread fraudulent property assessments, 42 million endangered households, hundreds of impending bank failures, and extraordinary gold-price targets are not independently substantiated within the interview.

The discussion is therefore best understood as Vexler's financial and legal thesis rather than an established forecast of an imminent collapse.

4 411 Open
ConnorF replied in Monetary Literacy & Mastery Foundation · 2 weeks ago
Do you use a VPN to browse the internet?

VPNs are useful, but I think they're advertised as doing a lot more than they actually do. They can help protect your connection and hide your IP address from websites, but cookies, browser fingerprinting and logged-in accounts can still identify you. Definitely not a complete privacy solution.

5 458 Open
rockfleece replied in Monetary Literacy & Mastery Foundation · 2 weeks ago
The 40 year bond bubble is over

On Oct 21, 2026, Prospector49 said:

It's strange how many people think bonds can't lose money. Even a Treasury bond can lose a considerable amount of market value when interest rates rise. You might eventually get the promised payments if you hold it to maturity, but that doesn't help much if you need to sell it early.

Especially considering you probably won't get more purchasing power holding it to maturity. The number may be bigger but the value might not be.

5 300 Open
Cedric posted in AdminBanner · 2 weeks ago
PHP vulnerabilities addressed

As some of you may have heard, the PHP team recently announced two critical security vulnerabilities affecting several PHP versions.

You can read more about them on the official PHP website.

We would like to let you know that we've taken the necessary steps to address these vulnerabilities and have applied the relevant security updates to our infrastructure.

Keeping AdminBanner secure is something we take seriously, and we continue to monitor security announcements to make sure we're up to date with the latest fixes.

There is no action required from our users or connected communities.
It is however recommended you apply the necessary patches to your servers.


We just wanted to keep everyone informed. 🙂

113 Open
ConnorF replied in Monetary Literacy & Mastery Foundation · 2 weeks ago
Study Tools Upgraded to Learning Dashboard

One feature I especially like about this approach is treating learning as something you return to rather than something you complete once and forget.

It's easy to read an article, understand it at the time, and then forget half of it several weeks later.

The bookmarks, notes, and reading progress make it much easier to build upon what you've already studied.

2 99 Open
ConnorF replied in Monetary Literacy & Mastery Foundation · 2 weeks ago
Nominal Confusion: Why Rising Prices Don't Always Mean Rising Value

This is why I think purchasing power is a much better starting point than simply looking at the dollar value of an investment.

A stock portfolio increasing by 50% sounds impressive until you ask what happened to the prices of the things you actually want to purchase.

The most useful question isn't whether your portfolio is worth more dollars, but whether it can purchase more real goods and services than it could before.

That changes how you look at almost every financial headline.

4 705 Open
Prospector49 replied in Monetary Literacy & Mastery Foundation · 2 weeks ago
The Nature of Money Creation: Cantillon Effect

The part of the Cantillon Effect that interests me most is that the consequences of monetary expansion depend on where the new money enters the economy.

Imagine two situations.

In the first, newly created bank credit primarily finances purchases of existing real estate and financial assets.

In the second, credit finances new factories, equipment, and productive businesses.

Both involve credit creation, but the economic consequences can be very different.

The first can contribute to higher asset prices, while the second may expand productive capacity.

Neither outcome is guaranteed, of course, but it demonstrates why simply measuring the total amount of money created doesn't tell us everything.

We should be paying much more attention to where banks direct their lending rather than focusing almost entirely on interest rates.

7 1K Open
Load more
ForumSpark © 2023 - 2026 · ForumSpark.net · Terms